1 week ago
153 notes

Crystal Disk (1992 vs. 2014) 

1 week ago
64 notes

Sailor Moon Crystal, Act 2: Eye details

1 week ago
865 notes

Sailor Mercury’s awakening (1992 vs. 2014)

1 week ago
0 notes

rainbow-sword reblogged your post Hi, thanks for your messages! Unfortun… and added:

…And personally I’m against SMC being actively inclusive towards male fans. Male anime fans tend to be very aggresive and in many cases also insulting and offensive…

You’re against the inclusion of men because they tend to be “very aggressive… insulting and offensive”? What I find truly insulting and offensive is the open expression and acceptance of gender selectivity and male ostracism in the SM community, under the pretense of being at risk of male aggression. What MLP fanatics have done should be of no relevance to the decision-making of SM event coordinators at all. Obsessive fans of either gender exist and it is unreasonable to hold an entire gender accountable for the machinations of some otakus.

I am aware that Takeuchi designed Sailor Moon with young girls in mind, and that it is the demographic she and her team market towards. I am totally okay with that. What’s not okay is the disparagement of men for their personal enjoyment and appreciation of Sailor Moon. Sure, men may not have practical use for a lot of the merchandise (i.e. lingerie & cosmetics), but that nevertheless does not preclude them from enjoying the products. 

1 week ago
2 notes

Hi, thanks for your messages! Unfortunately, I don’t think I completely understand all of it, especially with what comes after and including the child porn. What does that have to do with the events exactly?

The post I made addressed the women-only stipulation under the assumption that it was meant to safeguard the personal safety of women. I do realise that SM is a Shojo manga/anime geared toward a female audience, and I have no problems if the event coordinators simply want to ensure that the turnout of fans at the event reflects that vision.

But I still don’t think gender-limiting the attending fans in response to overzealous male fans buying and hoarding all the merch is appropriate. If all the previous events were dominated by men, wouldn’t it be prudent of them (esp. financially) to be more inclusive towards men? Just my thoughts.

1 week ago
52 notes

prettysenshiconfessions:

I picked up major homophobic vibes from the decision to allow men to attend the SMC premiere event only if accompanied by a woman. I get that this is about stopping gross otaku guys from harassing women but as a gay man, I don’t see why other gay men can’t attend unless they drag a woman with them. My partner and I have been Sailor Moon fans since our school days so what’s the problem? What about trans women? Are they basing gender on looks? This seems so problematic and foolish.

submitted by anon

Homophobic? No. Sexist? Maybe. And definitely worth questioning especially if the motive behind the stipulation of having a female companion is to create a “safe space” for women from “gross otaku guys” - the underlying implication being that women are at the mercy of men.

I find it incredibly ironic that the conditions for entrance to an SM event emphasize female vulnerability when one of the central themes to Sailor Moon is female empowerment and independence. What is also disconcerting to me is the portrayal of men as perpetrators and aggressors of violence. If the prospect of imminent male-on-female violence and harassment is oh so threatening, where and when do we draw the line for creating these so-called “safe spaces”? Why don’t we segregate classes and workplaces by gender? Why should women live in constant fear of men?

There seems to be this pervasive Manichean view on social justice issues: one subset of people (women, blacks, gays) are perennial victims who should be given special privileges, while another subset are profiled to be the sole offenders of social crimes. There is absolutely no grey area. The reality is that every group is disadvantaged in their own way, and social justice that caters to a particular group isn’t justice at all - it’s preferential treatment and that’s not equality. 

1 week ago
19 notes
1 week ago
9 notes

This is a screenshot of Ami’s completed schoolwork, and there’s something that’s bothering me about this - it’s the fact that I got different answers. Before I elaborate, I should note that I can’t read any of the Japanese so I simply solved for the unknowns. It’s entirely possible that I misinterpreted the question (albeit unlikely since it’s math — the universal language).

Without going into the details, the answers I got were (in order): 2+2√3, 2-4√3, -2+8√3, 2, 7.

We got the same answers for the last two. The way I solved for the remaining three assumes equivalent values for the three As (there are three separate equations) so that might be the problem. In other words, this may not be a system of equations. What’s weird is that I substituted Ami’s answers (the three that we differed on) into the first equation and it didn’t work out: the equation doesn’t add up. So… what gives? Did the genius girl who scored perfects blunder on a simple algebra problem or am I missing something?

1 week ago
974 notes

Mamoru Chiba (1992 vs. 2014)

1 week ago
39 notes

SM/SMC: Shingo